Agency Comparison
ERA vs R H
Head-to-head comparison based on CEA transaction records, AgentScore data, and Google reviews.
7,009
ERA agents
14
R H agents
90.4
ERA avg score
61
R H avg score
Which agency is better, ERA or R H?
ERA is the larger agency with 7,009 registered agents, compared to 14 at R H. ERA agents score higher on average (90.4 vs 61 out of 100). ERA agents have completed more total transactions (92,819). The right agency depends on your property type, location, and whether you need a specialist or generalist agent.
ERA vs R H by the numbers
Top ERA agents
ERA specializations
R H specializations
ERA top areas
R H top areas
Deciding between ERA and R H? Compare their agents directly.
Aggregate numbers only tell part of the story. The agent you work with matters more than the agency name. Compare top agents from ERA and R H side by side on transaction history, area expertise, and AgentScore to find the right fit.
FAQ
Is ERA or R H better?
Based on AgentScore data, ERA agents have a higher average score (90.4/100) compared to R H (61/100). However, both agencies have top performers scoring 94/100. The best agent for you depends on your specific property type and district.
How many agents does ERA have vs R H?
ERA has 7,009 registered agents while R H has 14. Of those, 500 ERA agents and 11 R H agents have enough transaction data to receive an AgentScore.
Are these rankings paid or sponsored?
No. FairComparisons rankings are calculated from CEA transaction records, URA data, and Google reviews. Agencies cannot pay for a higher position. All data is sourced from public government records.
Comparing ERA and R H?
Get notified when we update agency data, agent rankings, or add new comparison metrics.
More agency comparisons
All data from CEA (Council for Estate Agencies) Public Register and URA transaction records. Rankings are calculated, not purchased. This comparison is for informational purposes only.