Agency Comparison
ERA vs WILD WILD
Head-to-head comparison based on CEA transaction records, AgentScore data, and Google reviews.
7,009
ERA agents
12
WILD WILD agents
90.4
ERA avg score
56.8
WILD WILD avg score
Which agency is better, ERA or WILD WILD?
ERA is the larger agency with 7,009 registered agents, compared to 12 at WILD WILD. ERA agents score higher on average (90.4 vs 56.8 out of 100). ERA agents have completed more total transactions (92,819). The right agency depends on your property type, location, and whether you need a specialist or generalist agent.
ERA vs WILD WILD by the numbers
Top ERA agents
ERA specializations
WILD WILD specializations
ERA top areas
WILD WILD top areas
Deciding between ERA and WILD WILD? Compare their agents directly.
Aggregate numbers only tell part of the story. The agent you work with matters more than the agency name. Compare top agents from ERA and WILD WILD side by side on transaction history, area expertise, and AgentScore to find the right fit.
FAQ
Is ERA or WILD WILD better?
Based on AgentScore data, ERA agents have a higher average score (90.4/100) compared to WILD WILD (56.8/100). However, both agencies have top performers scoring 94/100. The best agent for you depends on your specific property type and district.
How many agents does ERA have vs WILD WILD?
ERA has 7,009 registered agents while WILD WILD has 12. Of those, 500 ERA agents and 11 WILD WILD agents have enough transaction data to receive an AgentScore.
Are these rankings paid or sponsored?
No. FairComparisons rankings are calculated from CEA transaction records, URA data, and Google reviews. Agencies cannot pay for a higher position. All data is sourced from public government records.
Comparing ERA and WILD WILD?
Get notified when we update agency data, agent rankings, or add new comparison metrics.
More agency comparisons
All data from CEA (Council for Estate Agencies) Public Register and URA transaction records. Rankings are calculated, not purchased. This comparison is for informational purposes only.