Agency Comparison
Huttons vs PropNex
Head-to-head comparison based on CEA transaction records, AgentScore data, and Google reviews.
4,858
Huttons agents
11,496
PropNex agents
68.1
Huttons avg score
77.1
PropNex avg score
Which agency is better, Huttons or PropNex?
PropNex is the larger agency with 11,496 registered agents, compared to 4,858 at Huttons. PropNex agents score higher on average (77.1 vs 68.1 out of 100). PropNex agents have completed more total transactions (101,236). The right agency depends on your property type, location, and whether you need a specialist or generalist agent.
Huttons vs PropNex by the numbers
Top Huttons agents
Huttons specializations
PropNex specializations
Huttons top areas
PropNex top areas
Deciding between Huttons and PropNex? Compare their agents directly.
Aggregate numbers only tell part of the story. The agent you work with matters more than the agency name. Compare top agents from Huttons and PropNex side by side on transaction history, area expertise, and AgentScore to find the right fit.
FAQ
Is Huttons or PropNex better?
Based on AgentScore data, PropNex agents have a higher average score (77.1/100) compared to Huttons (68.1/100). However, both agencies have top performers scoring 80/100. The best agent for you depends on your specific property type and district.
How many agents does Huttons have vs PropNex?
Huttons has 4,858 registered agents while PropNex has 11,496. Of those, 500 Huttons agents and 500 PropNex agents have enough transaction data to receive an AgentScore.
Are these rankings paid or sponsored?
No. FairComparisons rankings are calculated from CEA transaction records, URA data, and Google reviews. Agencies cannot pay for a higher position. All data is sourced from public government records.
Comparing Huttons and PropNex?
Get notified when we update agency data, agent rankings, or add new comparison metrics.
More agency comparisons
All data from CEA (Council for Estate Agencies) Public Register and URA transaction records. Rankings are calculated, not purchased. This comparison is for informational purposes only.