Agency Comparison
PropNex vs Huttons
Head-to-head comparison based on CEA transaction records, AgentScore data, and Google reviews.
11,496
PropNex agents
4,858
Huttons agents
91.8
PropNex avg score
89.3
Huttons avg score
Which agency is better, PropNex or Huttons?
PropNex is the larger agency with 11,496 registered agents, compared to 4,858 at Huttons. PropNex agents score higher on average (91.8 vs 89.3 out of 100). PropNex agents have completed more total transactions (112,519). The right agency depends on your property type, location, and whether you need a specialist or generalist agent.
PropNex vs Huttons by the numbers
Top PropNex agents
PropNex specializations
Huttons specializations
PropNex top areas
Huttons top areas
Deciding between PropNex and Huttons? Compare their agents directly.
Aggregate numbers only tell part of the story. The agent you work with matters more than the agency name. Compare top agents from PropNex and Huttons side by side on transaction history, area expertise, and AgentScore to find the right fit.
FAQ
Is PropNex or Huttons better?
Based on AgentScore data, PropNex agents have a higher average score (91.8/100) compared to Huttons (89.3/100). However, both agencies have top performers scoring 94/100. The best agent for you depends on your specific property type and district.
How many agents does PropNex have vs Huttons?
PropNex has 11,496 registered agents while Huttons has 4,858. Of those, 500 PropNex agents and 500 Huttons agents have enough transaction data to receive an AgentScore.
Are these rankings paid or sponsored?
No. FairComparisons rankings are calculated from CEA transaction records, URA data, and Google reviews. Agencies cannot pay for a higher position. All data is sourced from public government records.
Comparing PropNex and Huttons?
Get notified when we update agency data, agent rankings, or add new comparison metrics.
More agency comparisons
All data from CEA (Council for Estate Agencies) Public Register and URA transaction records. Rankings are calculated, not purchased. This comparison is for informational purposes only.