Agency Comparison
Huttons vs J ASIA
Head-to-head comparison based on CEA transaction records, AgentScore data, and Google reviews.
4,858
Huttons agents
2
J ASIA agents
89.3
Huttons avg score
77.7
J ASIA avg score
Which agency is better, Huttons or J ASIA?
Huttons is the larger agency with 4,858 registered agents, compared to 2 at J ASIA. Huttons agents score higher on average (89.3 vs 77.7 out of 100). Huttons agents have completed more total transactions (64,250). The right agency depends on your property type, location, and whether you need a specialist or generalist agent.
Huttons vs J ASIA by the numbers
Top Huttons agents
Huttons specializations
J ASIA specializations
Huttons top areas
J ASIA top areas
Deciding between Huttons and J ASIA? Compare their agents directly.
Aggregate numbers only tell part of the story. The agent you work with matters more than the agency name. Compare top agents from Huttons and J ASIA side by side on transaction history, area expertise, and AgentScore to find the right fit.
FAQ
Is Huttons or J ASIA better?
Based on AgentScore data, Huttons agents have a higher average score (89.3/100) compared to J ASIA (77.7/100). However, both agencies have top performers scoring 94/100. The best agent for you depends on your specific property type and district.
How many agents does Huttons have vs J ASIA?
Huttons has 4,858 registered agents while J ASIA has 2. Of those, 500 Huttons agents and 3 J ASIA agents have enough transaction data to receive an AgentScore.
Are these rankings paid or sponsored?
No. FairComparisons rankings are calculated from CEA transaction records, URA data, and Google reviews. Agencies cannot pay for a higher position. All data is sourced from public government records.
Comparing Huttons and J ASIA?
Get notified when we update agency data, agent rankings, or add new comparison metrics.
More agency comparisons
All data from CEA (Council for Estate Agencies) Public Register and URA transaction records. Rankings are calculated, not purchased. This comparison is for informational purposes only.